Login: GUEST @ JH4XSY.14.JNET1.JPN.AS [Tsuchiura]
home | newest check | boards | help index | log | ps | userlogin | send sysop | slog | status forward | bcm news | users | version | remove cookieIW2OHX > BPQ 11.06.25 01:03l 39 Lines 1022 Bytes #12 (0) @ WW BID : 55775_IW2OHX Subj: Re: LoRa "Packet" port on BPQ32 Path: JH4XSY<IW0QNL<HB9ON<DK0WUE<PD0LPM<VE3CGR<PA8F<PI8LAP<IW2OHX Sent: 250610/1547Z 55775@IW2OHX.ILOM.ITA.EU BPQ6.0.24 Hi Chris, I do agree. It's good for backbone links as well. With the configs I am using, the transfer rate is comparable with 2400/4800 bps of the old Packet Radio tncs. The range should be longer with less watts. Marco 73 de iw2ohx On Tue, 10 Jun 25 12:03:00 Z KQ6UP wrote: > R:250610/1234Z 29877@GB7OSW.#16.GBR.EU LinBPQ6.0.24 > R:250610/1234Z 44876@VE3CGR.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24 > R:250610/1233Z 14544@VE3QBZ.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24 > R:250610/1233Z 12846@N6CTA.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24 > R:250610/1231Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:34490 [Caterham Surrey GBR] > R:250610/1205z @:AA6HF.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM [Palm Springs] $:SXN2RP_KQ6UP > R:250610/1203z @:KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM [Grand Terrace, CA] DP6.00 > $:SXN2RP_KQ6 > > From: KQ6UP @ KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM (Chris) > To: BPQ @ WW > > I have played with this and it works well. Alas, > I don't have any neighbors within range to play > with this tech at this point. It would be good > for a backbone link. > > -73 de Chris KQ6UP > > >
前のメール | 次のメール