Login: GUEST @ JH4XSY.14.JNET1.JPN.AS [Tsuchiura]
home | newest check | boards | help index | log | ps | userlogin | send sysop | slog | status forward | bcm news | users | version | remove cookieKQ6UP > PACKET 19.05.26 22:10l 18 Lines 642 Bytes #13 (0) @ WW BID : 7376_KQ6UP Read: JH4XSY GUEST Subj: XZ Compression Path: JH4XSY<IW0QNL<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<N2NOV<KQ6UP Sent: 260519/1307Z 7376@KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.24 >From kq6up%kq6up.#sca.ca.usa.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue May 19 15:09:00 2026 Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0q.1) with SMTP id AA17060002 ; Tue, 19 May 2026 15:09:00 +0200 Message-Id: <7376_KQ6UP@n2nov.bbs> >From: kq6up@kq6up.#sca.ca.usa.noam X-JNOS-User-Port: Circuit (ARECS:N2NOV-7 N2NOV-7) -> Sending message I find that if I use XZ to compress my attachments prior to sending them as a 7plus file, I get the smallest possible file. As far I know, XZ has the highest compression ratio at the expense of a lot of processing time to compress. To "unzip" use the command unxz in Linux/UNIX. -73 de Chris KQ6UP
前のメール | 次のメール