Login: GUEST @ JH4XSY.14.JNET1.JPN.AS [Tsuchiura]
home | newest check | boards | help index | log | ps | userlogin | send sysop | slog | status forward | bcm news | users | version | remove cookie
I0OJJ > SYSOP 08.06.25 22:23l 85 Lines 3492 Bytes #6 (0) @ WW
BID : 86ZI0OJJ_002
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: IPIP failure
Path: JH4XSY<IW0QNL<HB9ON<DK0WUE<PI8ZTM<PI8LAP<VE2PKT<PY2BIL<LU9DCE<EA2RCF<
I0OJJ
Sent: 250608/1320z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] obcm1.08-10-g596e
From: I0OJJ @ I0OJJ.ITA.EU (Gustavo)
To: SYSOP @ WW
X-Info: This message was generated automatically
Hi,
generally I read msgs from several ML but
I learnt for some reasons to not reply to
debacts because time limitation...
But since the matter is always interesting
I want to contribute by using the packet
and give support with my findings.
The IPIP matter is deeply explained on several
places, so the reader is addressed to learn
by those means.
After the creation of the IPIP tunnel,
i.e. tunl0, the easy way is to capture the RIP
IPv4 from ucsd.edu, necessary to establish on
the linux machine the networks toward other
ampr.org sites.
The format of broadcasts is similar to the following:
09:45:00.754915 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 47, id 44672, offset 0, flags [none], proto IPIP (4), length 552)
amprgw.ucsd.edu > rmgate.ampr.org: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 532)
gw.ampr.org.router > rip2-routers.mcast.net.router:
RIPv2, Response, length: 504, routes: 25 or less
Simple Text Authentication data: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
AFI IPv4, gw.ampr.org/32, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: amprgw.ucsd.edu
AFI IPv4, k9jm.ampr.org/32, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: h94.3.40.69.dynamic.ip.windstream.net
AFI IPv4, 44.2.2.0/24, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: black-mountain-communications.e0-21.switch17.fmt2.he.net
AFI IPv4, 44.2.7.0/30, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: c-98-56-227-244.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
AFI IPv4, 44.2.10.0/29, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: c-50-189-14-165.unallocated.comcastbusiness.net
AFI IPv4, 44.2.10.8/29, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: 104.49.12.133
AFI IPv4, 44.2.11.8/29, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: syn-174-087-201-164.res.spectrum.com
AFI IPv4, 44.2.50.0/29, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: syn-097-094-148-032.res.spectrum.com
AFI IPv4, gw-kn6ixm.ampr.org/29, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: 216.218.193.200
AFI IPv4, 44.4.2.160/29, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: 70-90-167-65-CA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
AFI IPv4, 44.4.2.208/29, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: 108-228-10-20.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net
AFI IPv4, ki6zhd-net.ampr.org/29, tag 0x0004, metric: 1, next-hop: ampr.trinnet.net
<SNIP>
Since things are not always perfect, it
happens that the RIP broadcasts may be missing
also for several days. Things are greatly
improved as today and so (normally) the
portal.ampr.org is able to re-syncronize
my dynamic IP changes in, say, one/two hours.
Method used from new generations is the
rip44d/ampr-ripd utilities.
Me, old man generation, prefer to mungle
with encap.txt to obtain the scope.
However, to reply to the OM on the ARDC ML,
if you, obtain an 'ifconfig' reply similar
to the following, it means that your ADSL
router receives all IPIP traffic but cut
away the retransmission of IPIP traffic,
so no 44net operation is feasible.
tunl0: flags=193<UP,RUNNING,NOARP> mtu 1480
inet 192.168.1.100 netmask 255.255.255.255
tunnel txqueuelen 1000 (IPIP Tunnel)
RX packets 1935255 bytes 113660026 (108.3 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 493 bytes 23087 (22.5 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
My actual setup operation make the use of a
good ADSL router but it have the limitation
just described above.
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
non multa, sed multum
前のメール | 次のメール