OpenBCM V1.13D (Linux)

Login: GUEST @ JH4XSY.14.JNET1.JPN.AS [Tsuchiura]

Command:
home | newest check | boards | help index | log | ps | userlogin | send sysop | slog | status forward | bcm news | users | version | remove cookie

UT1HZM > RETRO    21.05.26 20:04l 34 Lines 1085 Bytes #2 (0) @ WW
BID : 42291_UT1HZM
Read: JH4XSY
Subj: Re: Vintage WinXP Packet?
Path: JH4XSY<JE7YGF<LU4ECL<LU9DCE<VE3CGR<IR0AAB<IR1UAW<IU7DTL<IW2OHX<UT1HZM
Sent: 260521/0813Z 42291@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU BPQ6.0.25

Hello Chris and all.

Original Message
> R:260519/0232Z 7353@KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.24
> 
> Any folks out there have fun with vintage software/hardware
> running Windows XP?  One of my favorite PR programs that
> runs on XP is WinPAC.  It is a very powerful PR terminal
> and mailbox application -- I would say it is the high water
> mark of packet radio terminal programs.  Anyone still use
> this, or remember it?
> 
> -73 de Chris KQ6UP
> 
> 

My bbs still run under XP + BPQ32, just old P-4 PC don't wants
to dead and doing well.
Of course its not optimal on electricity consumption, but its 
too lazy for me to change the platform.
Although I have RPi4 and few more modern PCs,
but for my tasks (HF packet with software modems) windows xp
is doing well.

Used Winpack much in past, but now to read/write bbs bulls simple
web interface and pop/smtp - for p-mails is more comfortable.
The only drawback of web/pop/smtp - is lack automatic 7plus data
files code/decode but that kind of traffic is very low and not
have much sense now at all, at least for me. 


73, Sergej.



前のメール | 次のメール